1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2007 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2007 Smart ForTwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2007 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2007 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Smart |
Model | Challenger | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1820 mm |