1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2008 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2008 Seat Toledo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 455 kg more than 2008 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2008 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Challenger | Toledo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |