1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | Challenger | A6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2833 mm |