1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 231 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | Rogue |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |