1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2010 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 223 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2010 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Challenger | Impala |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2807 mm |