1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 503 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 2339 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5885 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1887 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3670 mm |
