1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 750 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1971 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |
