1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 564 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 2093 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3505 mm |
