1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2011 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2011 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 166 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2011 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2789 mm |