1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 190 kg more than 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Land Rover |
Model | Challenger | Range Rover Evoque |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4356 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1966 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1605 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2662 mm |