1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 800 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2489 mm |