1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 133 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
| Model | Challenger | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1963 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2875 mm |
