1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 266 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | Challenger | ATS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2776 mm |
