1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2013 Hyundai Tucson
To start off, 2013 Hyundai Tucson is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 378 kg more than 2013 Hyundai Tucson.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2013 Hyundai Tucson | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Hyundai |
Model | Challenger | Tucson |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1452 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1655 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2640 mm |