1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 391 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Lotus |
| Model | Challenger | Evora |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1439 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2575 mm |
