1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 450 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Colt | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Colt | 6C |
Year Released | 1996 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3010 mm |