1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1967 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 455 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1967 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | 1967 Pontiac GTO | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
| Model | Colt | GTO |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 6375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2930 mm |
