1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 903 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (138 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 434 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2830 mm |