1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 662 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | Condor |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2660 mm |
