1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Symbol (97 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 50 kg more than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt (138 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (127 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Colt | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 97 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2473 mm |
