1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear weights approximately 605 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear. (193 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Delica Space Gear | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Delica Space Gear | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2351 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |
