1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse (210 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse (290 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | ZAZ |
| Model | Eclipse | 966 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
