1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse (141 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (177 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
Model | Eclipse | Colorado |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 177 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |