1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1952 Tatra T600
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Tatra T600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Tatra T600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1952 Tatra T600. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1952 Tatra T600.
Because 1952 Tatra T600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Tatra T600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Tatra T600. (118 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Tatra T600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1952 Tatra T600 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Tatra |
| Model | FTO | T600 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1530 mm |
