1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1953 Renault Colorale
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 2,381 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Renault Colorale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1953 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1953 Renault Colorale.
Because 1953 Renault Colorale is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Renault Colorale. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1953 Renault Colorale has manual transmission. 1953 Renault Colorale will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1953 Renault Colorale | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | FTO | Colorale |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2381 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 45 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
