1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1955 Packard Carribean
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Carribean. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Carribean would be higher. At 6,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Carribean is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Packard Carribean (306 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Packard Carribean should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1955 Packard Carribean is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Packard Carribean. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1955 Packard Carribean | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Packard |
Model | FTO | Carribean |
Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 306 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1530 mm |