1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1955 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1955 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Simca |
Model | FTO | Aronde |
Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |