1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1958 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1958 Opel Rekord | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
| Model | FTO | Rekord |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1680 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
