1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 1996 Mitsubishi FTO and 1972 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | FTO | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
