1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Celica (215 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1979 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | FTO | Celica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
