1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1980 Renault 14
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 14 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1980 Renault 14. (58 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 14.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 14. (92 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 14. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1980 Renault 14 has manual transmission. 1980 Renault 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1980 Renault 14 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | FTO | 14 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1218 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 58 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
