1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1982 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1982 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1982 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1982 Simca 2 Litres | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Simca |
| Model | FTO | 2 Litres |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
