1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1988 Acura Integra. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1988 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Acura Integra. (139 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Acura Integra. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1988 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1988 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
Model | FTO | Integra |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 139 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1290 mm |