1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 1998 Nissan Crew

To start off, 1998 Nissan Crew is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. Both 1996 Mitsubishi FTO and 1998 Nissan Crew are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1998 Nissan Crew. (130 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1998 Nissan Crew.

Because 1998 Nissan Crew is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Nissan Crew. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Nissan Crew. (175 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Nissan Crew. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1998 Nissan Crew has manual transmission. 1998 Nissan Crew will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: