1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | FTO | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 395 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1860 mm |