1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. Both 1996 Mitsubishi FTO and 2005 Nissan X-Trail are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | FTO | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
