1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2005 Toyota Vitz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Vitz is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Vitz. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Vitz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Vitz. (141 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Vitz. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2005 Toyota Vitz has manual transmission. 2005 Toyota Vitz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2005 Toyota Vitz | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | FTO | Vitz |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 141 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1530 mm |