1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (361 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | FTO | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 236 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 361 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |