1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2008 Renault Megane
To start off, 2008 Renault Megane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Megane. (148 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2008 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | FTO | Megane |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 226 km/hour | 198 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
