1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2010 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2010 Mercury Milan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Mercury Milan. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2010 Mercury Milan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercury Milan (233 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2010 Mercury Milan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2010 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mercury |
Model | FTO | Milan |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 233 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1445 mm |