1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2011 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2011 Fiat Croma is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Croma. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Croma (280 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2011 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2011 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2011 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2011 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Fiat |
Model | FTO | Croma |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 280 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 226 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1610 mm |