1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2011 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2011 Mazda Tribute is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2011 Mazda Tribute. (171 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda Tribute.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda Tribute (232 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2011 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
Model | FTO | Tribute |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 232 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4442 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1783 mm |