1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (518 HP) has 323 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (630 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | FTO | SL |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 518 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 630 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4592 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1816 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1298 mm |