1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2012 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Acura TL (370 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2012 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2012 Acura TL | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
| Model | FTO | TL |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4928 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1453 mm |
