1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac SRX (308 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2012 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | FTO | SRX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 308 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1669 mm |
