1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs. 2012 Citroen C4
To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C4. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C4. (147 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C4. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2012 Citroen C4 has manual transmission. 2012 Citroen C4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | 2012 Citroen C4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Citroen |
| Model | FTO | C4 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 202 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
