1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1997 Renault Helem

To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 399 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 624 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer (137 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.

Compare all specifications: