1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2003 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic (98 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (67 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 380 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic (204 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2003 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Lancer | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1640 mm |
