1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Buick Enclave
To start off, 2010 Buick Enclave is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Buick Enclave is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick Enclave (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick Enclave should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Buick Enclave weights approximately 818 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Buick Enclave (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (353 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Buick Enclave will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Buick Enclave | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Buick |
Model | Lancer | Enclave |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2168 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2007 mm |