1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (67 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C3 (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Citroen |
Model | Lancer | C3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1126 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |